Document Questions :: MyPleadings

How It Works
Pricing
States
Oregon Washington
Preview

Login
Free Trial

Large :: Small :: Close

*Jones v. Jones - Washington Divorce (Children)

< All Docs

Document: Petition to Invalidate (Annul) Registered Domestic Partnership (206)

In Packet: 200's: Divorce (Chapter 26.09 RCW)

Additional Questions

Case Questions
Minors

2. Information about the domestic partnership

Do the parties currently live in the same household?

Yes No

3. Request to invalidate

I ask the court to invalidate (annul) our domestic partnership because (check all that apply):

We are close relatives who are not allowed to become registered domestic partners under the law. (RCW 26.60.030) We did not meet the age requirements for a domestic partnership because at the time we registered (check all that apply)::

one of us was under age 18 we were both under age 62

One or both of us was legally married to or the registered domestic partner of another person at the time we registered our domestic partnership with each other. At the time we registered, one or both of us was unable to understand what it meant (lacked capacity to consent) either because of mental incapacity or the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other substances. We did not voluntarily live together as a couple (cohabit) after we both were able to understand and agree to be registered domestic partners. One of us agreed to become registered domestic partners because of pressure, force, or fraud. We did not voluntarily live together as a couple (cohabit) after the pressure or force stopped, or after finding out about the fraud. We did not register our domestic partnership in Washington state. According to the laws of the place where we registered our domestic partnership, our domestic partnership is void or voidable. We have not done anything to validate our domestic partnership according to the laws of:

4. Jurisdiction over the partners

The Court has jurisdiction over the Respondent because (check all that apply):

The Respondent lives in Washington State. The Petitioner and Respondent lived in Washington State while they were married, and the Petitioner still lives in this state or is stationed in this state as a member of the armed forces. The Petitioner and Respondent may have conceived a child together in this state. Other

The Court does not have personal jurisdiction over the Respondent

5. Is one of the partners pregnant?

Yes No

10. Children from other relationships

No other children I have other children My spouse has other children

11. Written Agreements

Do the parties have a written agreement?

Yes

Should the court enforce the written agreement?

Yes No

12. Real Property (land or home)

I ask the court to divide the real property according to the written agreement described in Paragraph 11. I ask the court to divide the real property fairly (equitably), as explained below:

Who should own this property?

111 Albany Lane, Tacoma, WA 98415

Petitioner Respondent

Manzanita Beach House

Petitioner Respondent

I ask the court to divide the real property fairly (equitably) as the court decides. The court does not have jurisdiction to divide the real property. Other:

13. Personal Property

We have already divided the property fairly. I ask the court to order that each partner will keep any personal property that they now have or control. I ask the court to divide the personal property according to the written agreement described in Paragraph 11. I ask the court to divide the personal property fairly (equitably), as explained below: I ask the court to divide the personal property fairly (equitably) as the court decides. The court does not have jurisdiction to divide the personal property. Other:

14. Debts

I am not aware of any debts. I ask the court to order each partner to be responsible for debts they incurred (made) after the date of separation. I ask the court to divide the debts according to the written agreement described in Paragraph 11. I ask the court to make the following orders about debts (check all that apply):

Each partner is responsible for their own debts Divide debts fairly (equitably), as explained below: Divide debts fairly (equitably) as the court decides

The court does not have jurisdiction to divide the debts. Other:

15. Maintenance (Alimony)

Maintenance is not needed Maintenance is needed. The:

Petitioner Respondent

has the ability to pay and should pay support:

as decided by the court. $___ every month until (date or event) according to the written agreement described in 11 above. other

16. Fees and Costs

No request Request fees

17. Protection Order

None requested Protection Order requested Protection Order already exists

18. Restraining Order

None requested Restraining Order requested

Do not disturb Stay away

Include this provision?

Also, not knowingly to go or stay within feet of my home, workplace, or school, or the daycare or school of any child listed in 6.

Yes No

Do not hurt or threaten Prohibit weapons and order surrender

Who should the weapons be surrendered to?

the police chief or sheriff their lawyer other person (name):

Other restraining orders

19. Name Change

No request Change the Petitioner’s name to:

20. Other requests, if any

Include other requests?

Yes No

________

Will the Respondent join the Petition?

Yes No

6. Children of the domestic partnership

Is the answer "Yes" to any of the following questions:

Children’s home/s: During the past 5 years have any of the children lived on an Indian reservation, outside Washington state, in a foreign country, or with anyone who is not a party to this case?
Other people with a legal right to spend time with a child: Do you know of anyone besides you and your partner who has (or claims to have) a legal right to spend time with any of the children?
Other court cases involving a child: Do you know of any court cases involving any of the children?

Yes

Select which specific items apply:

During the past 5 years a child has lived: on an Indian reservation, outside Washington state, in a foreign country, or with anyone who is not a party to this case There are other people with a legal right to spend time with a child There are court cases involving any of the children

7. Jurisdiction over the children

The court has jurisdiction:

The court can approve a Parenting Plan for the children my domestic partner and I have together because (check all that apply)

Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction Home state jurisdiction

The children:

lived in WA with a parent or someone acting as a parent for at least the 6 months did not live in WA, but WA was home state in last 6 months do not have another home state

No home state or home state declined Other state declined Temporary emergency jurisdiction

The court can make decisions for the children because the children are in this state now and were abandoned here or need emergency protection because the children (or the children’s parent, brother or sister) were abused or threatened with abuse. (Check one):

A custody case involving the children was filed in the children’s home state There is no valid custody order or open custody case in the children’s home state. If no case is filed in the children’s home state (or tribe) by the time the children have been in Washington for 6 months, Washington should have final jurisdiction over the children

Other reason

The court does not have jurisdiction.

8. Parenting Plan

The court can approve a parenting plan. I will file and serve my proposed Parenting Plan:

at the same time as this Petition later

The court cannot approve a Parenting Plan because the court does not have jurisdiction over the children

9. Child Support

Court Order

I ask the court to order my partner to pay his/her proportionate share of (check all that apply):

Check all that apply:

Daycare expenses Long-distance transportation expenses Education expenses Post-secondary (college or vocational school) support Other child-related expenses (specify):

I ask the court to order that we have the right to claim the children as dependents for purposes of personal tax exemptions and associated tax credits on our tax forms as follows (describe): _____

Administrative Order Supplement to Administrative Order

we have the right to claim the children as dependents for purposes of personal tax exemptions and associated tax credits on our tax forms as follows (describe): _____ my partner to pay his/her proportionate share of post-secondary (college or vocational school) support

MyPleadings is an online document automation service for family law professionals. MyPleadings provides high quality, state-specific forms, as well as customized solutions for your firm or organization.

MyPleadings is a better way to draft family law documents.

Contact

105 Parkview Dr.
Ste. B
Newberg, OR 97132
info@mypleadings.com
503-899-4045

Site Map

About
How It Works
Pricing
FAQ

Testimonials
Contact
Privacy
Terms of Service